Traitement en cours...
Fermer la notification

Le saviez-vous ?

SIDE a travaillé avec ses fournisseurs pour rendre ses colis respectueux de l'environnement.
Fini le plastique !
Le ruban adhésif qui sécurise la fermeture de nos colis et les chips de calage qui immobilisent les livres dans les cartons sont en matériaux recyclables et biodégradables.

Afficher la notification

JFK: The AI Verdict Conspiracy or Not?

Perez Daniel Dominique
Date de parution 10/09/2025
EAN: 9791042485474
Disponibilité Disponible chez l'éditeur
What if we finally let the facts speak for themselves? Since 1963, one question has divided people: one shooter Lee Harvey Oswald or a conspiracy? With no slogans and no endless theories, this book presents 14 technical case files and a clear method.... Voir la description complète
Nom d'attributValeur d'attribut
Common books attribute
ÉditeurBOOKELIS
Nombre de pages158
Langue du livreAnglais
AuteurPerez Daniel Dominique
FormatPaperback / softback
Type de produitLivre
Date de parution10/09/2025
Poids235 g
Dimensions (épaisseur x largeur x hauteur)0,00 x 15,60 x 23,40 cm
What if we finally let the facts speak for themselves? Since 1963, one question has divided people: one shooter Lee Harvey Oswald or a conspiracy? With no slogans and no endless theories, this book presents 14 technical case files and a clear method. Assisted by AI (data structuring, fps-to-ms conversions, scenario testing), the investigation is anchored in the observable: frame-by-frame reading of the Zapruder film (Z313-Z317), camera jiggles as an internal clock, examination of the single-bullet CE399, a metric re-examination of the Warren diagrams (CE 385/386/388), limousine geometry, the Oswald/Baker & Truly timeline plotted on scaled plans (validated by an architect), and a synthesis of Dictabelt acoustic analyses. Each file opens with a summary, then lays out measurements and geometric, kinematic, and forensic cross-checks, with explicit limits. Without revealing the verdict, this reproducible guide gives readers the criteria to form their own judgment.As Penn Jones Jr. says at the close of Mark Lane's Rush to Judgment (1966): I would love to see a computer faced with the problem of coming up with the probabilities in the assassination taking place the way it did, with all of these strange incidents that took place before and are continuing to take place after the assassination. I think all of us who love this country should be alerted that something is wrong in the way.